Compare models
Put up to 4 models beside each other — token prices, context windows, capabilities and provider, from the same catalogue the model pages read.
| Attribute | Veo 3.1 4K (Fast)veo3.1-fast-4k | GLM 5.3glm-5.3 | Claude Fable 5.1claude-fable-5.1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing | |||
| Request | $0.3225 / request | — | — |
| Billing | Pay Per Request | — | — |
| Cache Write (5m) | Not applicable | $1.40 / 1M | $12.50 / 1M |
| Cache Write (1h) | Not applicable | $1.40 / 1M | $20.00 / 1M |
| Cache Read | Not applicable | $1.40 / 1M | $1.00 / 1M |
| Input | — | $1.40 / 1M | $10.00 / 1M |
| Output | — | $4.40 / 1M | $50.00 / 1M |
| Web Search | — | $0 / 1M | $0 / 1M |
| Context | |||
| Max context | N/A | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Capabilities | |||
| Vision | No | No | Yes |
| Function Calling | No | Yes | Yes |
| JSON Mode | No | Yes | Yes |
| Streaming | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Catalogue | |||
| Provider | Z.AI | Anthropic | |
| Category | video | chat | chat |
| Charge type | Pay Per Request | Pay As You Go | Pay As You Go |
| Released | — | — | — |
| Description | |||
| Summary | Veo 3.1 is a state-of-the-art generative AI video model developed by Google DeepMind (part of the broader Gemini/Flow ecosystem). It builds on the earlier Veo models to make AI-generated video creation more realistic, expressive, and controllable. | GLM-5.3 is Z.ai's large-scale reasoning model designed for complex software engineering and long-horizon agentic workflows. It supports text input and output with a 1M-token context window, enabling sustained reasoning across large codebases and extended multi-step tasks. Building on GLM-5.2, it delivers stronger coding performance while improving the balance between capability and token efficiency, making it well suited for autonomous coding agents, large-scale engineering workflows, and complex task execution. | Claude Fable 5.1 is an upgraded version of Fable 5, delivering broad improvements with particularly strong gains in agentic coding, long-running workflows, and professional knowledge work. It excels at large code refactors, front-end and visual code generation, financial analysis, and complex analytical tasks. Compared with Fable 5, it also produces more concise plans and summaries while maintaining strong performance across extended tasks, making it a natural upgrade for existing Fable workflows and a strong option alongside Opus 5 for reasoning-intensive applications. |