Compare models
Put up to 4 models beside each other — token prices, context windows, capabilities and provider, from the same catalogue the model pages read.
| Attribute | Muse Spark 1.3muse-spark-1.3 | GPT OSS 120Bgpt-oss-120b | Claude Fable 5.1claude-fable-5.1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing | |||
| Input | $1.25 / 1M | $0.15 / 1M | $10.00 / 1M |
| Output | $4.25 / 1M | $0.75 / 1M | $50.00 / 1M |
| Cache Write (5m) | $1.25 / 1M | $0.15 / 1M | $12.50 / 1M |
| Cache Write (1h) | $1.25 / 1M | $0.15 / 1M | $20.00 / 1M |
| Cache Read | $1.25 / 1M | $0.15 / 1M | $1.00 / 1M |
| Web Search | $0 / 1M | $0 / 1M | $0 / 1M |
| Context | |||
| Max context | 1M | 131.1K | 1M |
| Max output | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Capabilities | |||
| Vision | Yes | No | Yes |
| Function Calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| JSON Mode | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Streaming | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Catalogue | |||
| Provider | Meta | OpenAI | Anthropic |
| Category | chat | chat | chat |
| Charge type | Pay As You Go | Pay As You Go | Pay As You Go |
| Released | — | — | — |
| Description | |||
| Summary | Muse Spark 1.3 is Meta's multimodal reasoning model designed for long-running agentic, multi-agent, and coding workflows. It maintains context and information across extended tasks, enabling reliable execution in complex, multi-step environments. The model is optimized to resolve conflicting information, seek clarification or confirmation when necessary, and execute concisely, making it well suited for autonomous agents, collaborative multi-agent systems, and long-horizon software engineering workflows. | gpt-oss-120b is an open-weight 117B-parameter MoE model from OpenAI, built for advanced reasoning and production workloads. Only about 5.1B parameters are active per step, and it’s optimized to run on a single H100 using MXFP4 quantization. It supports adjustable reasoning depth, full chain-of-thought, and native agent features like tool use, function calling, browsing, and structured outputs. | Claude Fable 5.1 is an upgraded version of Fable 5, delivering broad improvements with particularly strong gains in agentic coding, long-running workflows, and professional knowledge work. It excels at large code refactors, front-end and visual code generation, financial analysis, and complex analytical tasks. Compared with Fable 5, it also produces more concise plans and summaries while maintaining strong performance across extended tasks, making it a natural upgrade for existing Fable workflows and a strong option alongside Opus 5 for reasoning-intensive applications. |