Skip to content

Compare models

Put up to 4 models beside each other — token prices, context windows, capabilities and provider, from the same catalogue the model pages read.

  1. Muse Spark 1.3MetaRemove
  2. GPT Image 2OpenAIRemove
  3. Claude Fable 5.1AnthropicRemove
muse-spark-1.3 vs gpt-image-2 vs claude-fable-5.1
AttributeMuse Spark 1.3muse-spark-1.3GPT Image 2gpt-image-2Claude Fable 5.1claude-fable-5.1
Pricing
Input$1.25 / 1M$10.00 / 1M
Output$4.25 / 1M$50.00 / 1M
Cache Write (5m)$1.25 / 1MNot applicable$12.50 / 1M
Cache Write (1h)$1.25 / 1MNot applicable$20.00 / 1M
Cache Read$1.25 / 1MNot applicable$1.00 / 1M
Web Search$0 / 1M$0 / 1M
Request$0.04 / request
BillingPay Per Request
Context
Max context1M272K1M
Max outputN/AN/AN/A
Capabilities
VisionYesYesYes
Function CallingYesNoYes
JSON ModeYesNoYes
StreamingYesNoYes
Catalogue
ProviderMetaOpenAIAnthropic
Categorychatimagechat
Charge typePay As You GoPay Per RequestPay As You Go
Released
Description
SummaryMuse Spark 1.3 is Meta's multimodal reasoning model designed for long-running agentic, multi-agent, and coding workflows. It maintains context and information across extended tasks, enabling reliable execution in complex, multi-step environments. The model is optimized to resolve conflicting information, seek clarification or confirmation when necessary, and execute concisely, making it well suited for autonomous agents, collaborative multi-agent systems, and long-horizon software engineering workflows.GPT Image 2 combines OpenAI's GPT-5.4 with advanced image generation capabilities from GPT Image 2, enabling fully integrated multimodal workflows. It allows users to seamlessly transition between reasoning, coding, and visual generation within a single interaction, making it well suited for creative, development, and agent-driven applications that require both intelligence and visual output.Claude Fable 5.1 is an upgraded version of Fable 5, delivering broad improvements with particularly strong gains in agentic coding, long-running workflows, and professional knowledge work. It excels at large code refactors, front-end and visual code generation, financial analysis, and complex analytical tasks. Compared with Fable 5, it also produces more concise plans and summaries while maintaining strong performance across extended tasks, making it a natural upgrade for existing Fable workflows and a strong option alongside Opus 5 for reasoning-intensive applications.