Compare models
Put up to 4 models beside each other — token prices, context windows, capabilities and provider, from the same catalogue the model pages read.
| Attribute | GPT-5.6 Terra Progpt-5.6-terra-pro | Gemini 3.7 Flashgemini-3.7-flash | Claude Fable 5.1claude-fable-5.1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing | |||
| Input | $2.00 / 1M | $0.375 / 1M | $10.00 / 1M |
| Output | $12.00 / 1M | $1.88 / 1M | $50.00 / 1M |
| Cache Write (5m) | $2.00 / 1M | $0.375 / 1M | $12.50 / 1M |
| Cache Write (1h) | $2.00 / 1M | $0.375 / 1M | $20.00 / 1M |
| Cache Read | $2.00 / 1M | $0.375 / 1M | $1.00 / 1M |
| Web Search | $0 / 1M | $0 / 1M | $0 / 1M |
| Context | |||
| Max context | 1M | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Capabilities | |||
| Vision | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Function Calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| JSON Mode | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Streaming | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Catalogue | |||
| Provider | OpenAI | Anthropic | |
| Category | chat | chat | chat |
| Charge type | Pay As You Go | Pay As You Go | Pay As You Go |
| Released | — | — | — |
| Description | |||
| Summary | GPT-5.6 Terra Pro uses the same underlying model as GPT-5.6 Terra, but runs with reasoning.mode set to pro to deliver higher-quality responses on complex tasks. Optimized for deeper reasoning and greater reliability, it is well suited for advanced coding, multi-step reasoning, and agentic workflows where improved accuracy and solution quality are more important than maximizing speed or minimizing cost. | Gemini 3.7 Flash is Google's fast multimodal model designed for agentic workflows, coding, and complex multi-step reasoning. It combines responsive inference with reliable problem-solving capabilities, making it well suited for interactive and production-scale applications. Optimized for speed and dependable multi-step execution, Gemini 3.7 Flash is a strong choice for coding assistants, autonomous agents, and high-throughput workflows that require both low latency and capable reasoning. | Claude Fable 5.1 is an upgraded version of Fable 5, delivering broad improvements with particularly strong gains in agentic coding, long-running workflows, and professional knowledge work. It excels at large code refactors, front-end and visual code generation, financial analysis, and complex analytical tasks. Compared with Fable 5, it also produces more concise plans and summaries while maintaining strong performance across extended tasks, making it a natural upgrade for existing Fable workflows and a strong option alongside Opus 5 for reasoning-intensive applications. |