Skip to content

Compare models

Put up to 4 models beside each other — token prices, context windows, capabilities and provider, from the same catalogue the model pages read.

  1. GLM 5.3Z.AIRemove
  2. Codestral 2508Mistral AIRemove
  3. Claude Fable 5.1AnthropicRemove
glm-5.3 vs codestral-2508 vs claude-fable-5.1
AttributeGLM 5.3glm-5.3Codestral 2508codestral-2508Claude Fable 5.1claude-fable-5.1
Pricing
Input$1.40 / 1M$0.45 / 1M$10.00 / 1M
Output$4.40 / 1M$1.35 / 1M$50.00 / 1M
Cache Write (5m)$1.40 / 1M$0.45 / 1M$12.50 / 1M
Cache Write (1h)$1.40 / 1M$0.45 / 1M$20.00 / 1M
Cache Read$1.40 / 1M$0.45 / 1M$1.00 / 1M
Web Search$0 / 1M$0 / 1M$0 / 1M
Context
Max context1M256K1M
Max outputN/AN/AN/A
Capabilities
VisionNoNoYes
Function CallingYesYesYes
JSON ModeYesYesYes
StreamingYesYesYes
Catalogue
ProviderZ.AIMistral AIAnthropic
Categorychatchatchat
Charge typePay As You GoPay As You GoPay As You Go
Released
Description
SummaryGLM-5.3 is Z.ai's large-scale reasoning model designed for complex software engineering and long-horizon agentic workflows. It supports text input and output with a 1M-token context window, enabling sustained reasoning across large codebases and extended multi-step tasks. Building on GLM-5.2, it delivers stronger coding performance while improving the balance between capability and token efficiency, making it well suited for autonomous coding agents, large-scale engineering workflows, and complex task execution.Codestral is Mistral's cutting-edge language model for coding, released in late July 2025. It is purpose-built for low-latency, high-frequency developer workflows, excelling at tasks such as fill-in-the-middle (FIM) code completion, code correction, and test generation. Optimized for responsiveness and precision, Codestral is well suited for real-time coding assistance, IDE integration, and automated development pipelines where speed and accuracy are critical.Claude Fable 5.1 is an upgraded version of Fable 5, delivering broad improvements with particularly strong gains in agentic coding, long-running workflows, and professional knowledge work. It excels at large code refactors, front-end and visual code generation, financial analysis, and complex analytical tasks. Compared with Fable 5, it also produces more concise plans and summaries while maintaining strong performance across extended tasks, making it a natural upgrade for existing Fable workflows and a strong option alongside Opus 5 for reasoning-intensive applications.