Compare models
Put up to 4 models beside each other — token prices, context windows, capabilities and provider, from the same catalogue the model pages read.
| Attribute | Gemini 3.7 Flashgemini-3.7-flash | Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)gemini-2.5-flash-image | Claude Fable 5.1claude-fable-5.1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing | |||
| Input | $0.375 / 1M | — | $10.00 / 1M |
| Output | $1.88 / 1M | — | $50.00 / 1M |
| Cache Write (5m) | $0.375 / 1M | Not applicable | $12.50 / 1M |
| Cache Write (1h) | $0.375 / 1M | Not applicable | $20.00 / 1M |
| Cache Read | $0.375 / 1M | Not applicable | $1.00 / 1M |
| Web Search | $0 / 1M | — | $0 / 1M |
| Request | — | $0.075 / request | — |
| Billing | — | Pay Per Request | — |
| Context | |||
| Max context | 1M | N/A | 1M |
| Max output | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Capabilities | |||
| Vision | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Function Calling | Yes | No | Yes |
| JSON Mode | Yes | No | Yes |
| Streaming | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Catalogue | |||
| Provider | Anthropic | ||
| Category | chat | image | chat |
| Charge type | Pay As You Go | Pay Per Request | Pay As You Go |
| Released | — | — | — |
| Description | |||
| Summary | Gemini 3.7 Flash is Google's fast multimodal model designed for agentic workflows, coding, and complex multi-step reasoning. It combines responsive inference with reliable problem-solving capabilities, making it well suited for interactive and production-scale applications. Optimized for speed and dependable multi-step execution, Gemini 3.7 Flash is a strong choice for coding assistants, autonomous agents, and high-throughput workflows that require both low latency and capable reasoning. | Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (“Nano Banana”) is now generally available. It’s a state-of-the-art image generation model with strong contextual understanding, supporting image creation, editing, and multi-turn conversational workflows around visuals. | Claude Fable 5.1 is an upgraded version of Fable 5, delivering broad improvements with particularly strong gains in agentic coding, long-running workflows, and professional knowledge work. It excels at large code refactors, front-end and visual code generation, financial analysis, and complex analytical tasks. Compared with Fable 5, it also produces more concise plans and summaries while maintaining strong performance across extended tasks, making it a natural upgrade for existing Fable workflows and a strong option alongside Opus 5 for reasoning-intensive applications. |