Skip to content

Compare models

Put up to 4 models beside each other — token prices, context windows, capabilities and provider, from the same catalogue the model pages read.

  1. Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogleRemove
  2. Muse Spark 1.3MetaRemove
gemini-3.6-flash vs muse-spark-1.3
AttributeGemini 3.6 Flashgemini-3.6-flashMuse Spark 1.3muse-spark-1.3
Pricing
Input$1.50 / 1M$1.25 / 1M
Output$7.50 / 1M$4.25 / 1M
Cache Write (5m)$1.50 / 1M$1.25 / 1M
Cache Write (1h)$1.50 / 1M$1.25 / 1M
Cache Read$1.50 / 1M$1.25 / 1M
Web Search$0 / 1M$0 / 1M
Context
Max context1M1M
Max outputN/AN/A
Capabilities
VisionYesYes
Function CallingYesYes
JSON ModeYesYes
StreamingYesYes
Catalogue
ProviderGoogleMeta
Categorychatchat
Charge typePay As You GoPay As You Go
Released
Description
SummaryGemini 3.6 Flash is Google's high-efficiency model for coding, agentic workflows, and web and application development. It is optimized to produce polished, production-ready outputs with fewer unnecessary revisions, less hedging, and more direct task execution. By reducing both token usage and the number of model calls required to complete complex tasks, Gemini 3.6 Flash is well suited for high-throughput development, scalable agent systems, and cost-sensitive production workflows.Muse Spark 1.3 is Meta's multimodal reasoning model designed for long-running agentic, multi-agent, and coding workflows. It maintains context and information across extended tasks, enabling reliable execution in complex, multi-step environments. The model is optimized to resolve conflicting information, seek clarification or confirmation when necessary, and execute concisely, making it well suited for autonomous agents, collaborative multi-agent systems, and long-horizon software engineering workflows.