Skip to content

Compare models

Put up to 4 models beside each other — token prices, context windows, capabilities and provider, from the same catalogue the model pages read.

  1. Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)GoogleRemove
  2. DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeekRemove
gemini-2.5-flash-image vs deepseek-v4.1-flash
AttributeGemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)gemini-2.5-flash-imageDeepSeek V4.1 Flashdeepseek-v4.1-flash
Pricing
Request$0.075 / request
BillingPay Per Request
Cache Write (5m)Not applicable$0.30 / 1M
Cache Write (1h)Not applicable$0.30 / 1M
Cache ReadNot applicable$0.30 / 1M
Input$0.30 / 1M
Output$1.20 / 1M
Web Search$0 / 1M
Context
Max contextN/A1M
Max outputN/AN/A
Capabilities
VisionYesYes
Function CallingNoYes
JSON ModeNoYes
StreamingYesYes
Catalogue
ProviderGoogleDeepSeek
Categoryimagechat
Charge typePay Per RequestPay As You Go
Released
Description
SummaryGemini 2.5 Flash Image (“Nano Banana”) is now generally available. It’s a state-of-the-art image generation model with strong contextual understanding, supporting image creation, editing, and multi-turn conversational workflows around visuals.DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is a cost-efficient sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model in DeepSeek's V4.1 family, optimized for coding, reasoning, and agentic workflows. Despite its efficiency-focused positioning, DeepSeek reports that it surpasses the previous V4 Pro in performance, inference speed, and overall task completion time. The model is particularly strong at long-horizon, multi-step execution, making it well suited for coding agents, complex problem solving, and autonomous workflows that must reliably carry tasks through to completion.