Skip to content

Compare models

Put up to 4 models beside each other — token prices, context windows, capabilities and provider, from the same catalogue the model pages read.

  1. Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogleRemove
  2. DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeekRemove
gemini-2.5-flash vs deepseek-v4.1-flash
AttributeGemini 2.5 Flashgemini-2.5-flashDeepSeek V4.1 Flashdeepseek-v4.1-flash
Pricing
Input$0.075 / 1M$0.30 / 1M
Output$0.625 / 1M$1.20 / 1M
Cache Write (5m)$0.075 / 1M$0.30 / 1M
Cache Write (1h)$0.075 / 1M$0.30 / 1M
Cache Read$0.075 / 1M$0.30 / 1M
Web Search$0 / 1M$0 / 1M
Context
Max context1.0M1M
Max outputN/AN/A
Capabilities
VisionYesYes
Function CallingYesYes
JSON ModeYesYes
StreamingYesYes
Catalogue
ProviderGoogleDeepSeek
Categorychatchat
Charge typePay As You GoPay As You Go
Released
Description
SummaryGemini 2.5 Flash is Google's main high-performance model for complex reasoning, coding, math, and scientific tasks. It has built-in “thinking” features that help it produce more accurate, context-aware answers.DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is a cost-efficient sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model in DeepSeek's V4.1 family, optimized for coding, reasoning, and agentic workflows. Despite its efficiency-focused positioning, DeepSeek reports that it surpasses the previous V4 Pro in performance, inference speed, and overall task completion time. The model is particularly strong at long-horizon, multi-step execution, making it well suited for coding agents, complex problem solving, and autonomous workflows that must reliably carry tasks through to completion.