Compare models
Put up to 4 models beside each other — token prices, context windows, capabilities and provider, from the same catalogue the model pages read.
| Attribute | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813deepseek-v4-pro-0813 | GPT-6 Astra Progpt-6-astra-pro | Claude Fable 5.1claude-fable-5.1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing | |||
| Input | $0.435 / 1M | $10.00 / 1M | $10.00 / 1M |
| Output | $0.87 / 1M | $50.00 / 1M | $50.00 / 1M |
| Cache Write (5m) | $0.435 / 1M | $10.00 / 1M | $12.50 / 1M |
| Cache Write (1h) | $0.435 / 1M | $10.00 / 1M | $20.00 / 1M |
| Cache Read | $0.435 / 1M | $10.00 / 1M | $1.00 / 1M |
| Web Search | $0 / 1M | $0 / 1M | $0 / 1M |
| Context | |||
| Max context | 1M | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Capabilities | |||
| Vision | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Function Calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| JSON Mode | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Streaming | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Catalogue | |||
| Provider | DeepSeek | OpenAI | Anthropic |
| Category | chat | chat | chat |
| Charge type | Pay As You Go | Pay As You Go | Pay As You Go |
| Released | — | — | — |
| Description | |||
| Summary | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is DeepSeek's large-scale Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model and the general availability (GA) release of DeepSeek V4 Pro. It is designed for high-capability workloads requiring advanced reasoning, coding, and agentic task execution. As the production-ready V4 Pro release, it is well suited for complex software engineering, long-horizon agent workflows, and demanding reasoning tasks where reliability and model capability are critical. | GPT-6 Astra Pro uses the same underlying model as GPT-6 Astra, but runs with reasoning.mode set to pro for higher-quality responses on complex tasks. Optimized for deeper reasoning, greater accuracy, and more reliable multi-step execution, it is well suited for demanding coding, analysis, and agentic workflows where solution quality takes priority over speed and cost. | Claude Fable 5.1 is an upgraded version of Fable 5, delivering broad improvements with particularly strong gains in agentic coding, long-running workflows, and professional knowledge work. It excels at large code refactors, front-end and visual code generation, financial analysis, and complex analytical tasks. Compared with Fable 5, it also produces more concise plans and summaries while maintaining strong performance across extended tasks, making it a natural upgrade for existing Fable workflows and a strong option alongside Opus 5 for reasoning-intensive applications. |